Why this humanistic philosophy
is being turned into a 'religion'
THE REASON IS SIMPLE
In the case where fundamental beliefs and values are involved that deal with "the meaning of life" and how best to conduct it, the type of organizational structure that is most appropriate is that of "religion." (Religion deals with beliefs and values.) What most people don't under-
stand is that religion need not be based on a belief in supernatural forces. If it constitutes a constructive and comprehensive set of beliefs, values, behaviors, documents, meetings, etc.; it legitimately qualifies as a "religion." ("Humanism" has already been deemed to be "religion" by the United States Supreme Court [ Torcaso vs. Watkins, 1961].)
If a "philosophy" remains just a "philosophy," it is something "to think about "— but tends to lack any specific means of implementation. It is only when a philosophy becomes institu-tionalized that it starts to have a tangible influence and impact. When you think about it, most religions are "philosophies" that have been institutionalized in order to attract people and have some type of tangible influence in the course of events and people’s lives. And when we further think about it, those religions (because they have been institutionalized) are some of the most powerful, long lasting, and influential organizations that exist (despite the fact that they seem very implausible and have often been very abusive.)
But religion doesn't have to be mythical and abusive. Instead, it can be rational and humane. Certainly "Humanism" meets these higher standards. Unfortunately, Humanism (regardless of how noble it is) remains a relatively unadopted philosophy that has not achieved the prom-
inence and influence it deserves — most notably because it has never formed itself into a strong organization. (Strangely, many Humanists are so against religion that they devote a lot of time speaking out against it, rather than forming a viable alternative of their own.) As such, "Humanism" is not having much of an influence and impact at a time when it is most needed.
THE POTENTIALIST MOVEMENT shares the views of humanism, but differs considerably in application and implementation:
(1) We call ourselves "Potentialists," rather than "Humanists" because it is more appropriate
(2) We operate as a "religion," rather than a "philosophy"
(3) We have regular services, activities, and congregations (like other religions), rather than
infrequent get togethers or regional conferences
(4) We have 2 complete books as our foundation, rather than a short statement of principles
(5) We focus on putting our beliefs and values into practice, and creating viable solutions,
rather than devoting a lot of time debating old issues, justifying positions, and being defensive
(6) We are positive, upbeat, and inspirational, rather than appearing negative and cynical
(7) We deal with the localized world over which we have control, rather than universalities
(8) We are intent upon expanding our influence, rather than having very little impact on anything
By having the POTENTIALIST MOVEMENT be a "religion" (rather than just a "philosophy"), the growing number of people who no longer relate to traditional religion (but are inclined to be "potentialistic") have the strongest possible organization to join in order to help develop their potential, achieve intended objectives, and realistically maximize chances for success.
Whenever a group of people (in the minority)
face a really challenging task, it makes a great deal
of sense to join forces and form the strongest organi-
zation possible in order to achieve the intended objectives and maximize the chances for success .